5/8/2023 0 Comments Lyn for mac review![]() ![]() might just be the solution, and I'm a tad embarrassed by that. I mean, there isn't enough data to do anything substantial with, after all. If you'd asked me a few years ago - nay, a few days ago - whether it would be worth keeping images where you missed focus, I'd have said no. However, the question for us photographers is whether it can save images where you missed focus. Ok, well, it is staggeringly impressive at restoring old photographs in a way that I wasn't sure was possible, and that has significant application and value, both historic and otherwise. The results are reminiscent of tintype photography and I'm stunned with how much of a photograph we now have. waved its wand were simply an exposure correction, some cloning and tidying, and then a few creative tweaks. On out-of-focus images of people I know, it was between a close approximation and indistinguishable. There's no way to verify just how accurate an image of the woman this is, but from all the tests I've run (and I have found myself a bit addicted to seeing what Remini can do,) it's pretty close. I must have compared the before and after a hundred times in disbelief. Then, I'll let Remini generate the detail, and I'll manually try to fix the rest. So, I had the idea to find a very difficult image that is low resolution, underexposed, and lacking any detail. I've had some tremendously difficult images sent to me by people who only have one photograph of a family member, for example. It is primarily aimed at your average user, and I'm attempting to apply it to a different, more demanding context, but what if I teamed up with the A.I? Some years ago, I used to make money by restoring old photographs, but it wasn't as cost-effective as other work so now I only do it on a request basis. Now, I want to take this app in a slightly different direction. I have never seen anything like this, and I didn't know realism of this caliber was possible. The detail it adds to the face as a whole is incredibly detailed, not only in areas you might expect like the eyes, but the hairline and mustache have gone from a blurry mass to believable and intricate hairs. I am truly speechless at the level Remini is able to deliver. (This account made the news some years back as they have uploaded over five million historic photographs under Creative Commons it's a goldmine!) The test images I found were on the Internet Archive Book Images on Flickr and used under Creative Commons. The most testing environment I could imagine would be using it on images from the early 1900s, where there is a distinct lack of quality, sharpness, useful contrast, dynamic range, and a boatload of imperfections. ![]() Remini's blurb gives a vague sense of what it can do: "Remini engages state-of-art AI generative technology to bring professional film production level image enhancing and restoration technologies to our daily life." For a free app, that sounds like a load of old tosh, but I thought I'd put it through its paces. But not like most apps that purport to restore images where they apply some sharpening and noise reduction, this app generates detail that isn't there. rather than changing major elements of images, it's restoring them. However, this week, I've seen a quite different function of A.I. In 2020, I have spent a fair amount of time with Luminar products in particular as I've developed a relationship with them, and what they're doing is pretty singular. Then, in the last year, I've gradually seen the improvement and value of these tools. I had and have absolutely no issue with that, but I didn't feel these tools were aimed at me. I saw tools using A.I. for post-production of images as a time-saver for photographers who aren't particularly bothered about bleeding every last iota of quality out of their edits or true-to-life accuracy. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |